Distributed consensus protocols are the backbone of blockchain networks and cryptocurrencies. Achieving consensus in a decentralized network where participants don't fully trust each other is no easy task. But several breakthroughs in distributed systems research paved the way for blockchains as we know them today. In this article, we'll review some of the fundamental concepts underpinning decentralized consensus.
The Byzantine Generals' Problem
In 1982, Leslie Lamport published a paper titled "The Byzantine Generals Problem." This framed one of the key challenges in distributed computing: how to reach agreement amongst distributed nodes when some nodes may fail or act maliciously.
Imagine a group of generals planning to attack a city, but they need to coordinate to attack at the same time. Some generals might be traitors trying to sabotage the plan. The loyal generals need a protocol to guarantee they attack simultaneously. This is analogous to blockchain nodes needing to agree on the state of the ledger.
Lamport's paper proved that consensus was possible using cryptographic techniques as long as no more than one-third of the nodes were faulty. This established fundamentals for fault tolerance in distributed systems.
Public Key Cryptography
Public key cryptography, invented in the 1970s, provided another critical component for decentralized consensus. It enables participants to verify each other's identities and signatures in a distributed network.
In public key crypto systems like RSA, each node has a public-private key pair. The private key can create digital signatures on messages, while the public key can verify signatures. This allows secure communication without prior relationships.
Blockchains use public-key signatures to validate transactions. The use of cryptographic identities is essential for peer-to-peer consensus models.
Hash functions like SHA-256 also play an important role in distributed consensus protocols. These one-way functions take an input and generate a unique output digest. Hash functions have useful properties like fast computation and collision resistance that make them ideal for blockchain consensus.
In proof-of-work systems, hashing is used in puzzle solving and block validation. In other protocols, it provides linkage between blocks and enables consensus rules based on node identities. The security of underlying hash functions is critical.
Bitcoin popularized blockchains using proof-of-work (PoW) consensus in 2008. In PoW, nodes compete to solve computational puzzles in order to validate new blocks. This process is known as mining.
By linking blocks via cryptographic hashes and making block creation resource-intensive through puzzles, PoW provides a decentralized mechanism to achieve ledger consensus without identities. However, the energy costs of mining have led many projects to explore alternatives.
Alternatives to Proof-of-Work
Many consensus models have been proposed as more efficient alternatives to PoW:
- Proof-of-Stake (PoS): Validators stake capital on block creation instead of hashes. Assigns validation rights proportional to stakes.
- Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS): Validators are elected based on stakes delegated to them by token holders.
- Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance: Validator nodes actively collaborate on consensus using rounds of cryptographic voting.
- Federated Byzantine Agreements: Consensus determined by a pre-approved group of validators rather than a fully open pool.
- Directed Acyclic Graphs: Consensus models based on block graphs rather than sequential chains.
Each approach makes different tradeoffs between decentralization, security, and scalability. Ongoing research aims to refine these models.
Game Theory and Mechanism Design
Distributed consensus protocols must provide incentives for nodes to participate honestly in the network. Game theory and mechanism design informs the development of cryptoeconomic models that motivate desired behavior.
Concepts like Nash equilibria and dominant strategy equilibrium are used to model incentives for securing consensus under different consensus models and parameter choices. Proper incentives are critical to security.
Reaching consensus without centralized control is no trivial feat. Distributed ledger technology was made possible by advances across computer science research, from Byzantine agreement to public key cryptography, hash functions, and game theory mechanics. Ongoing work refines and expands on the foundations to make decentralization viable for a wider range of applications.